Complete Guide to Arbitration | Conciliation & Alternate Dispute Resolution | Notes for Law Students

ARBITRATION

Meaning and Nature: Arbitration is a legal process where two or more parties agree to resolve their disputes privately without going to a court. They appoint an arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators to hear their case and give a binding decision, known as an arbitral award. This process is governed in India by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitration is known for being quicker, cheaper, and more confidential than court litigation. It is less formal and allows parties to have greater control over the selection of arbitrators, the location of hearings, and the procedural rules followed. It is especially useful in resolving commercial and contractual disputes.

Scope and Importance: Arbitration is extensively used in sectors like construction, infrastructure, trade, insurance, and international business. With globalization, international commercial arbitration has become essential in resolving cross-border disputes. The key advantages include privacy, specialized adjudicators, reduced legal formalities, and minimal court intervention. It helps reduce the burden on the judiciary and supports a faster justice system. The enforceability of arbitral awards across more than 160 countries (via the New York Convention) adds to its global significance.

Arbitration Agreement: This is the basis for initiating arbitration. It must be in writing and signed by the parties. It could be a separate agreement or a clause in the main contract. It should clearly show the intention to resolve disputes through arbitration and may mention aspects like the seat of arbitration, applicable law, language, and number of arbitrators. Without a valid arbitration agreement, arbitration cannot proceed. The agreement ensures both parties are legally bound to resolve disputes outside the court.

Arbitral Tribunal: The tribunal consists of a sole arbitrator or a panel (usually three arbitrators). The parties have freedom to choose arbitrators. If they fail to appoint, the court appoints arbitrators under Section 11. The tribunal must act fairly, independently, and give both parties a chance to be heard. The tribunal is empowered to decide its own jurisdiction and make interim orders. It plays a central role in conducting proceedings and passing the final award.

Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal: The arbitral tribunal can decide whether it has the authority to hear the case (Kompetenz-Kompetenz principle). It can examine the validity of the arbitration agreement and the scope of disputes submitted. Courts have limited powers to intervene at this stage. If jurisdiction is challenged, the tribunal must decide it early on.

Conduct of Arbitral Proceedings: The proceedings are less rigid than court trials. The tribunal and parties can mutually decide the procedure. It typically involves submission of claims, responses, evidence, witness examination, and oral hearings. There is flexibility in rules of evidence, but fairness and equal opportunity must be ensured. The tribunal has the power to issue interim measures.

Making of Arbitral Award: The award must be in writing, signed by all arbitrators, and give reasons unless parties agree otherwise. It should address all claims made and specify costs, interest, and timelines. It should be delivered within 12 months (extendable by 6 months). The award is binding and enforceable as a decree of the civil court.

Termination of Proceedings: Arbitration ends either when the final award is made or if the parties settle the dispute amicably. It can also terminate if the claimant withdraws the case, both parties agree to end it, or continuation becomes impossible. A termination order is passed by the tribunal in such cases.

Recourse Against Arbitral Award: An award can be challenged under Section 34 of the Act on limited grounds: invalid agreement, lack of proper notice, excess jurisdiction, procedural unfairness, or conflict with public policy. Fraud and corruption are also valid grounds. The challenge must be filed within 3 months of receiving the award. Courts cannot review merits of the case.

Finality and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards: Once the time for challenging the award is over, or if the court rejects the challenge, the award becomes final. Under Section 36, it can be enforced like a civil court decree. It can be executed through the court by attaching the properties of the losing party.

Appeal and Revision: Appeals can be made against certain orders, such as refusal to refer parties to arbitration, appointment of arbitrators, or setting aside an award. The appeal must be filed within the prescribed time. Revision is not generally allowed unless there’s a jurisdictional error. Arbitration law limits appeals to ensure minimal court interference.

Recent Amendments: Key amendments were made in 2015, 2019, and 2021 to make arbitration in India faster, more efficient, and business-friendly. Provisions were introduced for fast-track arbitration, confidentiality, time-bound awards, and regulation by the Arbitration Council of India.

FOREIGN AWARDS

New York Convention Awards: The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958, is a global treaty that ensures arbitration awards from one country are recognized and enforced in another. India is a signatory to this Convention. Under Part II, Chapter I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, India enforces awards made in convention countries. To get an award enforced, the party must submit the original or certified copy of the award and arbitration agreement. The court examines only procedural aspects—not merits. It can deny enforcement only on limited grounds:

If parties lacked legal capacity.
Arbitration agreement was invalid.
Proper notice was not given.
Tribunal acted beyond the scope of agreement.
Procedure was improper.
Award is not binding or set aside in the home country.
Enforcement is against Indian public policy. This ensures international trust in Indian arbitration and helps Indian awards gain recognition in foreign countries.

Geneva Convention Awards: Before the New York Convention, the Geneva Convention, 1927, governed enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. It is now largely obsolete. India still recognizes Geneva Convention awards under Part II, Chapter II of the Act, but most countries have moved to the New York Convention due to its better and more uniform enforcement mechanisms. The grounds and procedures under Geneva are similar but more cumbersome.

Importance of Foreign Awards: The ability to enforce foreign arbitral awards enhances cross-border trade and investment. Businesses prefer arbitration over courts due to ease of enforcement in multiple jurisdictions. It also gives confidence to foreign investors that their interests will be protected in India. Thus, India’s arbitration system, supported by the New York Convention, makes it an attractive destination for international dispute resolution.

3. CONCILIATION

Meaning and Application:
Conciliation is a process of resolving disputes where a neutral third person, called a conciliator, helps the disputing parties to reach an amicable settlement. Unlike arbitration, where the arbitrator gives a decision, conciliation focuses on facilitating communication and negotiation between parties. It is voluntary and informal. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, provides legal recognition to conciliation in India, encouraging its use to reduce court backlog and promote quicker dispute resolution. Conciliation can be applied to any civil or commercial dispute.

Scope and Commencement of Proceedings:
Conciliation can be started either by an agreement between parties or by a court or tribunal referring the matter to conciliation. Usually, the parties approach a conciliator after the dispute arises, or sometimes it is agreed upon in the contract as the first step before arbitration or litigation. Once the parties agree to conciliate, proceedings begin with the appointment of a conciliator and initial meetings to understand the issues.

Appointment of Conciliators:
Parties can mutually appoint one or more conciliators. If they cannot agree, an appointing authority (specified in the contract or law) appoints the conciliator. The conciliator must be impartial, independent, and trustworthy. The conciliator’s role is not to decide who is right or wrong but to help parties communicate, identify issues, and explore possible solutions.

Submission of Statements and Role of Conciliator:
The parties submit written statements outlining their points of view, claims, and suggestions to the conciliator. The conciliator then holds meetings, individually and jointly, to facilitate dialogue, clarify misunderstandings, and encourage cooperation. Unlike arbitration, conciliation proceedings are flexible, informal, and confidential, allowing parties to freely express their concerns.

Communication between Conciliator and Parties:
The conciliator can communicate with each party separately or together. These communications remain confidential and cannot be used as evidence if conciliation fails and the dispute proceeds to court or arbitration. The conciliator tries to build trust and persuade parties to consider mutually acceptable solutions.

Settlement Agreement:
If the parties reach an agreement, it is recorded in writing as a settlement agreement, signed by both parties and the conciliator. This agreement is binding and has the same effect as a court decree. It can be enforced by the court if one party fails to comply with it.

Termination of Conciliation Proceedings:
Conciliation ends when a settlement is reached and signed, or if parties decide to end the process without agreement. It also terminates if the conciliator concludes that further efforts will not help or if any party withdraws. The conciliator issues a certificate confirming termination.

Costs and Deposits:
The parties share the cost of the conciliator and the process, usually as agreed beforehand. Deposits may be made to cover fees and expenses. Conciliation is generally cheaper than arbitration or litigation.

RULE-MAKING POWERS

Overview:
Rule-making powers refer to the authority granted by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to certain bodies to create detailed procedural rules to manage arbitration and conciliation processes effectively. These rules help ensure consistency, fairness, and smooth conduct of proceedings. The two main authorities empowered to make such rules are the High Courts and the Central Government of India.

Role of High Courts:
Under Section 89 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) and related provisions in the Arbitration Act, High Courts have the power to formulate rules regarding arbitration and conciliation conducted under their jurisdiction. This includes prescribing how arbitration applications are filed, how arbitrators are appointed, the procedure for enforcement of awards, and other related matters. High Courts tailor these rules to suit local needs and ensure speedy disposal of arbitration matters.

For example, some High Courts have prescribed specific time frames within which an arbitral award must be passed or set aside. They can also set guidelines for the appointment of arbitrators to avoid delays and conflicts of interest. These rules are designed to make arbitration more accessible and reduce procedural bottlenecks.

Role of Central Government:
The Central Government has the authority to make rules for the overall implementation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, including matters related to international arbitration. These rules cover important aspects such as the conduct of arbitrations, enforcement of awards, qualifications and registration of arbitrators, fees payable, and procedural details for conciliation.

For instance, the government notifies Model Arbitration Rules and may also frame rules regarding fast-track arbitration and institutional arbitration. The central government also plays a role in the regulation of arbitration institutions and promotion of arbitration-friendly policies.

Importance of Rule-Making Powers:
The rule-making powers help bridge gaps in the law by providing clear procedures. This leads to:

Faster resolution of disputes,
Uniformity in handling arbitration cases,
Reduction in litigation and court intervention,
Greater confidence among parties in the arbitration process.

These rules are essential for adapting arbitration to modern business needs and ensuring India’s arbitration laws are in line with global standards.

ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SYSTEM (ADR)

Development, Meaning, and Objectives:

Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to methods of resolving disputes outside traditional court litigation. ADR systems have grown because courts are overloaded, cases take too long, and litigation is expensive. ADR offers faster, cheaper, and more flexible dispute resolution.

The main objective of ADR is to promote harmony by allowing parties to settle conflicts amicably, maintaining relationships, and reducing burden on courts. ADR includes various methods like arbitration, mediation, negotiation, and conciliation. It respects party autonomy and confidentiality.

Advantages of ADR:

Faster resolution of disputes compared to courts.
Cost-effective and less formal.
Confidential and private.
Parties control the process and outcome.
Maintains business and personal relationships.
Reduces backlog in courts.
Flexibility in procedure and timing.

Types of ADR Systems:

Mediation:
A neutral mediator helps parties communicate and find a mutually acceptable solution. Unlike arbitration, the mediator does not decide but facilitates dialogue.
Arbitration:
A neutral arbitrator or panel hears the case and gives a binding decision.
Negotiation:
Parties communicate directly to settle disputes themselves without third-party intervention.
Mini-Trial:
An informal process where parties present their cases to a neutral advisor who gives a non-binding opinion, helping settlement.
Judicial Settlement:
Courts encourage settlement between parties, sometimes through court-connected ADR centers.
Fast Track Arbitration:
A quicker arbitration procedure with strict timelines.
Final Offer Arbitration:
Each party presents their final offer, and the arbitrator chooses one.
Multi-door Courthouse:
A center offering various ADR services under one roof.
Online Dispute Resolution:
Use of digital platforms for mediation or arbitration, especially useful for cross-border disputes.
Family Settlements:
ADR used to resolve family disputes amicably, often through mediation or conciliation.

Lok Adalats:
A special form of ADR organized by legal services authorities to settle disputes amicably. Lok Adalats have the power to handle civil, criminal compoundable, and other cases. Their awards are final and binding, enforceable like a court decree. They provide free, speedy justice to people, especially in rural areas.

6. LOK ADALATS

Meaning and Purpose:
Lok Adalats, meaning “People’s Courts,” are a special form of Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) designed to provide quick, inexpensive, and amicable settlement of disputes. They are organized under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. Lok Adalats work on the principle of voluntary settlement, where parties agree to resolve their differences without going through lengthy court procedures. The primary objective is to reduce the burden on courts and provide accessible justice, especially to those who cannot afford formal litigation.

Organization and Structure:
Lok Adalats are organized at various levels—national, state, district, and taluka (sub-district) levels—by legal services authorities. They are presided over by retired or sitting judges, lawyers, social workers, or other respected members of society. These members act as conciliators or mediators to help parties reach a compromise.

Types of Cases Cognizable:
Lok Adalats handle both civil cases (like matrimonial disputes, property disputes, money recovery, motor accident claims) and criminal cases (only compoundable offenses where the parties can settle). They can also take cases pending in court or disputes not yet filed.

Procedure:
The procedure in Lok Adalats is informal and flexible, aiming to reduce technicalities and ensure speedy settlement. Parties voluntarily agree to participate and negotiate. The court fee paid, if any, is refunded if the matter is settled in Lok Adalat.

Awards and Powers:
The settlement reached in Lok Adalat is called an award. It is final, binding on parties, and enforceable like a decree of a civil court. There is no appeal against a Lok Adalat award, which promotes finality. If parties do not settle, the case may proceed to regular court.

Advantages:

Free or very low cost.
Quick disposal.
Reduces litigation backlog.
Preserves relationships between parties.
Accessible to rural and poor sections of society.

7. CASE LAWS IN ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION

Case 1: ONGC Ltd. vs Western Geco International Ltd. (2014) – Arbitration

Facts:
ONGC entered into a contract with Western Geco International Ltd. for seismic data acquisition services. A dispute arose regarding payment and contract performance, leading to arbitration as per the agreement. The arbitral tribunal passed an award in favor of Western Geco.

Western Geco filed for enforcement of the award in Indian courts. ONGC challenged the award on grounds of jurisdiction and procedural irregularities.

Judgment:
The Supreme Court of India upheld the arbitral award, emphasizing minimal judicial interference in arbitral decisions. It reaffirmed that courts should not interfere with an award except on limited grounds provided under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act (e.g., fraud, violation of public policy). The court also clarified that errors of law or fact are not sufficient reasons to set aside an award. This judgment strengthened the principle of finality and autonomy in arbitration.

Case 2: Salem Advocate Bar Association vs Union of India (2005) – Conciliation

Facts:
The Supreme Court of India took suo moto cognizance of delays and inefficiencies in the Indian judicial system. It stressed the need to explore Alternative Dispute Resolution methods like conciliation and mediation to reduce court backlog. The Court directed that conciliation should be promoted, especially in government contracts and commercial disputes, to ensure faster settlement.

Judgment:
The Court highlighted the importance of conciliation under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, encouraging parties to resort to conciliators before escalating matters to courts. It emphasized that conciliation proceedings are voluntary, confidential, and flexible. The judgment promoted institutional reforms for establishing conciliation cells and mechanisms.

This case marked a significant push toward institutionalizing conciliation as a mainstream dispute resolution mechanism in India.

NOTE : For Project Making , You Can use the Below Article

Project File for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in India: Arbitration, Conciliation & Mediation with Landmark Cases

#Arbitration #Conciliation #AlternateDisputeResolution #ADR #LawStudents #LegalNotes #DisputeResolution #ArbitrationAct #LegalStudies