Lok Adalat Award in 138 NI Act Case Enforceable by Civil Court

βš–οΈ Lok Adalat Award in Cheque Bounce Case Can Be Executed as Civil Decree: Andhra Pradesh HC


πŸ“Œ Introduction

Lok Adalat Award in 138 NI Act Case Enforceable by Civil Court. In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that an award passed by a Lok Adalat in a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is executable by a civil court. This judgment addresses a frequently debated legal issue β€” whether a criminal case settlement under Lok Adalat can be enforced through civil mechanisms.

The Court clarified that such an award has the status of a civil decree under Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and hence is executable before a civil court even though the original case arises from a criminal complaint.


πŸ“œ Background of the Case

  • Petitioner: A complainant in a cheque dishonour case filed under Section 138 NI Act.

  • Respondent: The accused person, who had issued the dishonoured cheque.

  • Facts: The matter was settled in a Lok Adalat, and an award was passed directing the accused to pay the cheque amount.

  • Dispute: The accused failed to comply with the Lok Adalat award, leading the complainant to seek execution in a civil court. The respondent objected, claiming that a criminal matter cannot be executed in a civil court.


βš–οΈ Judgment Summary

πŸ›οΈ Case Name:

Venkata Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr
(Andhra Pradesh High Court, 2024)

πŸ” Key Issue:

Whether an award passed by a Lok Adalat in a Section 138 NI Act case is executable as a civil decree?

πŸ“Œ High Court’s Findings:

  1. Nature of Lok Adalat Awards

    • Citing Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, the court held that an award of Lok Adalat is deemed to be a decree of a civil court.

    • It is final and binding on both parties, and no appeal lies against it.

  2. Civil Execution Allowed

    • The award, even if passed in a criminal case, results from a compromise, which is in the nature of a civil liability (repayment of money).

    • Therefore, execution can be initiated in a civil court.

  3. Not a Bar Due to Criminal Origin

    • Just because the underlying case was filed under Section 138 NI Act does not bar civil enforcement of the Lok Adalat award.

    • The Court clarified that compounding of offences and awards based on settlement are contractual in nature and hence civilly enforceable.


πŸ” Legal Provisions Cited

πŸ“˜ Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881:

Provides for penal consequences for dishonour of cheques due to insufficient funds or exceeding arrangement.

πŸ“˜ Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987:

β€œEvery award of the Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a decree of a civil court and shall be final and binding on all the parties…”


🧠 Legal Significance of the Judgment

This decision is significant for several reasons:

βœ… 1. Clear Execution Mechanism

Complainants in cheque dishonour cases can now execute Lok Adalat awards in civil courts if the accused fails to pay.

βœ… 2. Legal Enforcement of Settlements

Reinforces the status of Lok Adalat as a quasi-judicial authority whose decisions are enforceable like civil decrees.

βœ… 3. Hybrid Nature of 138 NI Cases

Recognizes that although 138 NI cases are criminal in procedure, the underlying transaction involves civil liability, making civil enforcement valid.

βœ… 4. Reduces Burden on Criminal Courts

Parties can now seek remedies through civil execution, reducing reliance on repeated criminal proceedings for recovery.


πŸ” Analysis of Related Case Law

πŸ“Œ State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh (2008) 2 SCC 660

Lok Adalats are not courts in the traditional sense but have power to pass awards equivalent to civil decrees.

πŸ“Œ K. N. Govindan Kutty Menon v. C.D. Shaji (2012) 2 SCC 51

Upheld compounding of offences under Section 138 NI Act through Lok Adalat awards.


πŸ“˜ Practical Implications for Litigants

Scenario Remedy After Lok Adalat Award
Accused fails to pay after settlement File Execution Petition before jurisdictional Civil Court
Settlement involved post-dated cheque Civil execution valid, even if cheque bounces again
Party seeks appeal against award No appeal allowed against Lok Adalat award
Enforcement needed across states Decree transferable under CPC for cross-state execution

✍️ Sample Format for Execution Petition (Excerpt)

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE

EXECUTION PETITION UNDER SECTION 21 OF THE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987

Petitioner: Mr. XYZ
Respondent: Mr. ABC

Respectfully Showeth:

1. That the Petitioner filed a complaint under Section 138 NI Act.
2. That the parties settled in Lok Adalat on 20/12/2023 and an award was passed directing Respondent to pay β‚Ή2,00,000.
3. That the Respondent failed to comply with the award.
Prayer:
That the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to execute the award as a decree of the Court and direct recovery of the amount.
Petitioner
(Through Counsel)

🧾 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

❓ Can a Lok Adalat award in a cheque bounce case be enforced in a civil court?

βœ… Yes, the award is deemed a civil decree under Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act.

❓ What if the accused doesn’t pay after Lok Adalat settlement?

βœ… You can file an execution petition in the civil court for recovery.

❓ Is the Lok Adalat award appealable?

❌ No. The award is final and binding. No appeal or revision lies against it.

❓ Does it matter that the original case was criminal in nature?

βœ… No. The enforceability of the award is civil, regardless of the criminal origin.


🧾 Conclusion

The Andhra Pradesh High Court’s ruling provides clarity and relief for complainants in cheque dishonour cases. It firmly establishes that even if a matter originates under Section 138 of the NI Act, an award passed by a Lok Adalat can be enforced like a civil court decree.

This judgment strengthens the enforceability of settlements and promotes alternative dispute resolution, reducing the burden on criminal courts and accelerating justice delivery for financial disputes.


πŸ“š Sources & References

  1. Venkata Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AP High Court, 2024

  2. Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

  3. Section 21, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987

  4. K. N. Govindan Kutty Menon v. C.D. Shaji (2012) 2 SCC 51

  5. State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh (2008) 2 SCC 660

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top